TAX ALERT | November 08, 2022

Authored by RSM US LLP

The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) recently published the final Crypto-Asset Reporting Framework (CARF) along with proposed amendments to the Common Reporting Standard (CRS). If adopted, these changes will increase reporting requirements and the compliance burden for crypto-asset exchanges, brokers and anyone who engages in crypto transactions. 

The Crypto-Asset Reporting Framework CRYPTO-ASSET REPORTING FRAMEWORK

On Oct. 10, 2022, the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) published the final Crypto-Asset Reporting Framework (CARF) along with proposed amendments to the Common Reporting Standard (CRS). CARF was created by the OECD in conjunction with G20 countries as a global transparency framework that requires the automatic reporting and exchange of taxpayer information on crypto-asset transactions between jurisdictions for residents of their countries. If adopted, these changes will alter the reporting landscape for crypto-asset exchanges and brokers as well as anyone that engages in crypto transactions.

The OECD released a draft version of the CARF in March 2022 for public consultation in April 2022. Despite comments from the public that the rules were unduly burdensome and required additional reporting for crypto-assets and crypto-asset exchanges that was much broader in scope than what is generally required for other taxpayers, the OECD’s final revised framework does not grant substantial relief to individuals or entities that fall within the scope of the proposed changes. However, the OECD is expected to continue to develop guidance as the scope of transactions subject to reporting continues to evolve. While commenters have consistently requested more time to implement the rules, an effective date has not yet been set, but with publication of final guidance, taxpayers with digital assets and intermediaries effectuating transactions involving digital assets, should consider CARF and the CRS amendments as notice that they should prepare now to be compliant with the new rules once they are implemented by OECD member countries. Delaying may lead to significant compliance shortcomings or even penalties. 

If approved by the G20, the CARF will facilitate tax information sharing on crypto transactions between the OECD’s member countries, including the U.S.The OECD has indicated that further guidance on the implementation of the CARF is forthcoming, along with a framework of bilateral and multilateral competent authority agreements and technical guidance and solutions for handling the reporting required under CARF. In the meantime, however, there are several key changes from the draft CARF framework and proposed amendments to CRS as published in March 2022 to the final version published in October 2022, including:

• CRS will now allow financial institutions to meet due-diligence requirements using government verification services (GVS).
• The final CARF rules eliminate the requirement for crypto-asset users to confirm information on self-certification forms received from crypto-asset users within 36 months of the date the form is received. The final rules also permit service providers to rely on new account due diligence procedures performed for CRS purposes, and requires Reporting Crypto-Asset Service Providers (RCASPs) to stop effectuating transactions if:
  • A pre-existing account holder has not provided a self-certification within 12 months; 
  • A self-certification is not provided when a new account is opened; or
  • An updated self-certification is not received within 90 days of a change in circumstances.
• Under CARF’s final rules, RCASPs are only required to report retail payment transactions if the RCASP is required to verify the customer under domestic anti-money laundering laws. Also, reporting is limited to high value transactions with a de minimis threshold of $50,000. We anticipate additional guidance from the OECD on reportable retail payment transactions, including guidance on whether information on controlling persons is required to be collected for such transactions.
• The final guidance explicitly states that non-fungible tokens (NFTs) are subject to CARF. Commentary for the revised framework specifies that the term “Crypto-Asset” encompasses both fungible and non-fungible tokens and therefore includes NFTs representing rights to collectibles, games, works of art, physical property or financial documents that can be digitally traded or transferred to other individuals or entities.
• Additional information related to crypto-assets will be reportable on future CRS reports including fields for whether the account is a preexisting account or a new account, whether a valid self-certification has been obtained, the type of financial account and the role of controlling persons.
• CRS now clarifies that compliance with the reporting and due diligence requirements of both regimes is required. However, reporting under CARF only will be permitted when the disposal of assets will result in duplicate reporting.  
• Financial institutions can now rely on Anti-money laundering (AML) and Know Your Customer (KYC) procedures for pre-existing and new entity accounts when determining a controlling person if the procedures are substantially similar to the 2012 FATF recommendations.
• There are also several important changes to definitions under the revised amendments to the CRS including: 
  • Excluded accounts – Certain capital contribution accounts are now included in the definition of excluded accounts.
  • Depository Institution – the definition of depository institution under CRS now includes entities that hold Specified Electronic Money Products or Central Bank Digital Currencies for the benefit of customers. The definition also includes entities that are licensed to engage in certain banking activities but end up not engaging in banking or similar activities.
  • Investment Entity – the amended definition clarifies that investors of funds can be considered “customers” and that the funds themselves can be considered to conduct activities “as a business.” This definition aligns with the FATF recommendations.
  • Dual-resident account holders – under the amended definition, reporting financial institutions must now report account holders with multiple tax residencies as tax resident in all of the jurisdictions, regardless of tie-breaker rules in applicable tax conventions.
• Under CARF’s final rules, for a reportable account that is maintained by a reporting financial institution as of the effective date of the revised rules, due diligence procedures for reporting periods ending by the second calendar year following such date, are reduced and information about the role(s) of Reportable Persons that are Controlling Persons or Equity Interest holders of the Entity are only required to be reported if such information is available in the electronically searchable data maintained by the reporting financial institution;
• The requirement to report wallet addresses under CARF is eliminated and replaced with aggregate value and aggregate number of units transferred to non-RCASP wallets;
• CRS has an expanded definition of financial assets and investment entities that is intended to ensure that derivatives referencing crypto-assets that are held in custodial accounts and investment entities are subject to CRS reporting requirements.
• The final guidance under CARF explicitly states that non-fungible tokens (NFTs) may be considered an investment and a payment and are therefore subject to CARF.
• Future CRS reports are expected to include whether the account is a preexisting account or a new account, whether a valid self-certification has been obtained, and the type of financial account and the role of controlling persons.

---

This article was written by Aureon Herron-Hinds and originally appeared on 2022-11-08.
2022 RSM US LLP. All rights reserved.
https://rsmus.com/insights/tax-alerts/2022/oced-issues-final-crypto-asset-reporting-framework-now-what.html

The information contained herein is general in nature and based on authorities that are subject to change. RSM US LLP guarantees neither the accuracy nor completeness of any information and is not responsible for any errors or omissions, or for results obtained by others as a result of reliance upon such information. RSM US LLP assumes no obligation to inform the reader of any changes in tax laws or other factors that could affect information contained herein. This publication does not, and is not intended to, provide legal, tax or accounting advice, and readers should consult their tax advisors concerning the application of tax laws to their particular situations. This analysis is not tax advice and is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for purposes of avoiding tax penalties that may be imposed on any taxpayer.

RSM US Alliance provides its members with access to resources of RSM US LLP. RSM US Alliance member firms are separate and independent businesses and legal entities that are responsible for their own acts and omissions, and each are separate and independent from RSM US LLP. RSM US LLP is the U.S. member firm of RSM International, a global network of independent audit, tax, and consulting firms. Members of RSM US Alliance have access to RSM International resources through RSM US LLP but are not member firms of RSM International. Visit rsmus.com/aboutus for more information regarding RSM US LLP and RSM International. The RSM(tm) brandmark is used under license by RSM US LLP. RSM US Alliance products and services are proprietary to RSM US LLP.